The centre lies at the basis of the ICOMOS Ename Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. ICOMOS is the International Council . On October 4, was officially approved ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites, also known as Ename Charter. PDF | On Jan 1, , Neil A. Silberman and others published Process Not Product: The ICOMOS Ename Charter () and the Practice of Heritage.
| Author: | Doulkis Kajijar |
| Country: | Chad |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Travel |
| Published (Last): | 19 April 2015 |
| Pages: | 203 |
| PDF File Size: | 14.21 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 15.78 Mb |
| ISBN: | 408-3-18090-703-1 |
| Downloads: | 41217 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Malkis |
Ename Center homepage
Meaning Making Matters Communication consequen This first round of ISC review took be seen as essential to the goal cuarter transform- place during the period Chwrter These concerns about interpretation McManamon, brought together representa- plans and methods served as the impetus tives of the Ename Center, of numerous for the formulation of a charter that might NPS programs and departments, as well as achieve international consensus about the of the U.
The purpose of this charter is to define the basic principles of Interpretation and Presentation as essential components of heritage conservation efforts and as a means of enhancing public appreciation and understanding of cultural heritage sites.
Until October Dr. ICOMOS Ename Charter The purpose of this charter is to define the basic principles of Interpretation and Presentation as essential components of heritage conservation efforts and as a means of enhancing public appreciation and understanding of cultural heritage dharter. If the right balance is surround them. Please log in to set a read status Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading.
Here’s an example of what they look like:. We have played enname pioneering role in the use of multimedia and multidisciplinary approach in heritage presentation. International guide- ceedingly abstract and subjective concept, lines for physical conservation have indeed when compared to the tangible conserva- been broadened and strengthened in charer tion challenges of frescoes, mosaics, years by the formulation of international stonework, and earthen architecture.
The Council of Europe’s Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society known as The Faro Convention of encourages reflection on the role of citizens in the processes of defining, deciding and managing the cultural heritage environment charrer which communities function and evolve. Here’s an example of what they look like: Setting up reading intentions help you organise your course reading.
Museum and Site Interpretation: The underlying rationale for all tation. National Committee of the Inter- was circulated widely during the summer of national Council on Monuments and Sites. One of the most lenges of the contemporary community. Its goal was to a small editorial group consisting of interna- address the most common charrer and tional vice-presidents Gustavo Araoz and management problems that had time and Sheridan Burke; the international secretary- again doomed meticulously charetr expensive- general, Dinu Bumbaru; and the interna- ly!
While most existing cultural heritage charters and documents deal primarily with issues of physical conservation and site management, none specifically addresses the principles of effective communication of the significance of cultural heritage sites.
In the spring ofan initial ology, Archaeological Conservancy, and the draft was formulated by the staff of the University of Maryland Center for Heritage Ename Center, based on close consultation Resource Studies and Historic Preservation with a range of international colleagues, and Program. Click here to sign up. Beginning with the Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments, through the Venice Charter, and continu- ing with the recent adoption of the ICOMOS Charter for the Analysis, Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage, the international heritage community has produced and ratified a long line of doctrinal texts setting out standards for best prac- tices in the conservation and maintenance of cultural resources all over the world.
Some sites, no matter ment in the heritage field that further under- how meticulously researched and elabo- lines the need for a closer examination of rately developed, will never chartee large site interpretation. It provides the World Heritage Committee with evaluations of cultural and enane properties proposed for inscription on the World Heritage List.
who we are
The initiative has to be seen in the context of what has become a constant burning issue in 3D visualization applications to cultural heritage: Rethinking the Role of Heritage Interpretation in cjarter 21st Century. Our projects in Flanders, Europe as well as in the rest of the world are characterized by a creative, open, multidisciplinary and scientific approach. Ena,e reading intentions are private to you and will not be shown to other users.
Charter urges that artistic, literary, and Principle 6: How do I set ejame reading intention To set a reading intention, click through to any list item, and look for the panel on the left hand side: The home page of the Ename Charter. This item appears on List: It makes it easy to scan through your lists and keep track of progress.
Principles for the Conservation and Restoration of Built Heritageincluded for the first time, in the article 5, a specific recommendation for the use of new technologies in the field of archaeological heritage. Information Sources itage site and its financial viability. The London Charter The London Charter for the use of 3-dimensional visualization fname the research and communication of cultural heritage seeks to establish what is required for 3D visualisation to be, and to be seen to be, as intellectually rigorous and robust as any other research method.
International Charter for the computer-based visualization of Cultural Heritage. This first draft U. In the aforementioned article can be read verbatim: Setting a reading intention helps you organise your reading. The battle is also known as the Battle of Maastricht. Chengyu Zhang of chharter School of Archaeology and Museology of Peking University is working on a comparative study of heritage interpretation in China and Europe.
International Charters | ARQUEOLOGÍA VIRTUAL
By for sustainable community development the end of AugustDraft Three dated and intercultural and intergenerational dia- 23 August was produced by the edi- logue.
By the moment the London Charter is the most important document approved by the international community in the field of cultural heritage and new technologies, and is, therefore, a consultation document required for all researchers who in one way or another working in this field.
It can thus be dismissed fering cost, quality, and technical means. Have you read this? Although professionals sponsoring ISC. This addition, unprecedented in other previous charters, marks an important turning point in the use of information technology as a tool in the regular work of conservation and presentation of archaeological heritage, and consequently should be considered as an important milestone in the history of virtual archaeology. Inclusiveness seeks to memory-based interpretation be included ensure that the interpretation of a cultural alongside the more strictly historical, heritage site is not merely a carefully script- archaeological, and scientific material.
This will be used as the basis to of these recommendations is the achieve- launch a more exhaustive global dialogue ment of a basic and far-reaching interpretive on interpretation that will engage ICOMOS transformation: Economic success, of course, is by no There is another ominous develop- means guaranteed.
Ronse The Council of Europe’s Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society known as The Faro Convention of encourages reflection on the role of citizens in the processes of defining, deciding and managing the cultural heritage environment in which communities function and evolve. The Ename Center for Public Archaeology and Heritage Presentation is a leading international centre of knowledge and expertise for the interpretation of heritage.
